50 Reasons I DO drink

Standard

Just a few days before New Years, an opinion piece, or at least what I assume is an opinion piece, because that is all it is, popped up of at the charismatic Christian website, Charisma News. It’s title, “50 Reasons I Don’t Drink” is exactly what it says. Written by a “Pastor” and “Ex-alcoholic”, it begins with a brief disclaimer, followed by a bit of personal experience, then the 50 points. So to begin, I will give a little explanation, my own disclaimer (I talk about sex and guns), then lastly, a point by point rebuttal.

The toughest part about being a Christians is the whole part about trying our best to follow the bible’s instructions and doing our best to let its teachings shape our hearts, and renew our minds. It is often uneasy business. Our author mentions that this issue is “hotly debated”, and in some circles it is, but in the bible it is NOT. Gathering all that we can read about alcohol from scripture, the picture does vary from verse to verse, but when we put it all together we see a very clear portrait about alcohol from the biblical perspective. A portrait I will try to paint as clearly as possible.

The bible allows the consumption of alcohol in moderation. Moderation is not a particular type of alcohol, or number a certain number of drinks. you should or should not take, the only prohibition we see is to not be drunk. Drunkenness seems to be a point of consumption to where self control is inhibited to a detrimental degree. It should be noted that many things can inhibit your self control, including your personal desires and emotions. If alcohol is bringing out those desires and emotions it is merely revealing what is in you heart, the problem is your internal thoughts, it is within you, not the external alcohol. Other than the strict prohibition from drunkenness, the only other prohibition we see is for some clergy members to abstain,  during certain personal oaths such as fasting, and personal conviction. Which is what we have a prime example of in this article, personal conviction. Other than that, this is basically all the scriptures has to say on alcohol in a nut shell.

Personal Conviction can be difficult. It can be very meaningful for you, you can find much to delight about in it, and when that personal conviction is designed to keep you safe from certain sinful proclivities of your own, it can be particularly life giving. This is the case with our personally convicted Charisma author in this article. As an ex-alcoholic, her personal conviction is meaningful and life-giving, and it keeps her from sin that she is specifically bent towards and weak too. So it makes it difficult for her to see why not all Christians see things her way. In matters like this we have the scriptures to counsel us, personal convictions are a great place to have great discussion, but we should never elevate them above what the bible actually says. This is what happens in this article, and this is the fatal flaw in which it’s reasoning is based.

This is where I find my main problem with this article. On the surface the obvious problem is a legalism where we elevate personal conviction to the level of God’s decree. This is a big deal, a real big deal, and something we should never do. However, what concerns me most is a blatant misunderstanding of what sin is, revealing that the main problem is a well meaning Christian who isn’t handling things like a Christian should. Which is according to the bible.

In a direct conversation I am sure our author could quote the correct passages on the nature of sin, but it seems obvious to me that she doesn’t understand them at all, and further more, she doesn’t want to. “This article is not a theological defense on the topic of Christians and alcohol (another article for another time), but it is a heartfelt plea.” If we are not thinking theologically, also known as biblically, then what are we doing exactly? Theology matters, and for the Christian, we look inconsistent at best when our theology doesn’t actually line up with our scriptures, and at worst, we make God look foolish when we think our ways are better than his.

I really do appreciate, and even agree somewhat with the genuine concern she has over sin, but the bible, if we are really Christian, must be considered in all that we say and we do! She seems to think the particular act of drinking alcohol is sinful, or that it causes one sin. This is not the case. Sin comes from the desires of our heart (Matthew 15:19), and our actions are only sinful when they coincide with those desires. I think the most obvious example of this is sex.

Is sex sinful? No, although some act like it is. Is sex sinful in a particular context? Yes, if you are married and have sex with someone that you are not married to, this is a sin. Was it the combinations of external factors that made it sinful? NO, it was the heart of the person who desired to have sex with someone who wasn’t there spouse that made the circumstances possible. Someone who’s heart is not bent towards infidelity id never going to accidentally find themselves in someone else’s bed. In fact if you change the context you can still have biblical sex, and it still be very sinful. So imagine this person is still with their spouse, and still in their own martial bed, but in their mind and heart they are imagining and desiring someone else. Guess what, all the external factors are there, the right person, the right place, but this person is still being and acting with atrocious sinful intent. They are having sex in a biblical context and still sinning! In her original article, our author clearly cannot see the difference between the external actions of sin, and the internal desires of the heart that lead to the external action.

Think of yourself like a gun, and you are loaded with bullets, these bullets are your sin. Just sitting there, you are pretty harmless, but you still have  great potential to fire off that sin at any moment. Your gun, because of its particular sins, can only be triggered by certain factors. For some, alcohol is the trigger that causes their gun to fire, for others, not so much. So for some, alcohol is indeed their trigger, and they should abstain until such a time that they can become unloaded of those particular sin bullets. External handling and self control is always needed, but we shouldn’t full ourselves into thinking that it can “unload” our gun, or that it can “load” our gun in a way that we are not prone to fire.

So while I see the value of her conviction for her and others like her (it keeps her trigger from being pulled), for me, a guy who has beer in his fridge that he really enjoys that he bought on vacation last year and still hasn’t drank. A guy who’s last beer consumed was two weeks ago at a friends house with a group of guys from my church. A guy who’s first drink ever was when he was 28. I simply cannot see the value for me. I think it is obvious that whatever sinful bents I have, and there are plenty, alcohol is not the trigger to my loaded sin gun. For others it is, and they may very well need to abstain, and the fact that I don’t does not make me any stronger or weaker or better than any other child in God’s kingdom, and neither does abstaining make anyone better. In fact, if alcohol can easily undo your Christians character and witness, then perhaps you are the weaker brother.

For the Christian, God’s law is where we need to debate, not over its validity, but over submitting to its understanding, and holding to its clear teaching that we may abstain not from alcohol, but from sin. This is where our fight should be, in the depths of our guts where our sin is hiding. If we are a gun loaded with sin and potential harm to ourselves and others, then our hope is that we would learn and grow and that over time, God, through His Son, and by His Spirit, would gently unload all of our chambers from their sin. Then and only then could we experience the freedom he has intended for us. The ultimate goal for a Christian that struggles with alcohol, is not that he would never drink, but that the underlying sinful desires that are triggered by drinking would be eliminated.

Hopefully I made a clear picture, sometimes I find it was much more clear in my head, and not so much in my typed words. If the picture is as clear as I hope, then we can see what happens when we apply a biblical understanding of sin to these 50 points. IF anything, maybe you’ll see how personal experience cannot be the test for corporate truth. It quickly disintegrates to personal truth versus personal truth, which gets us nowhere, except to show why truth must ultimately be objective rather than subjective.

50 reasons why I don’t drink vs 50 reasons I do

Her points in bold font vs my points in italics.

1. I can’t be sober-minded if I’m not sober.

Well I’m sorry to hear that, I can, so we ought not elevate out personal struggles and experience to the level of norm for all Christians. Maybe you are drinking too much when you drink, a clear violation of the prohibition not to be drunk. You should search your heart and see what underlying motives cause you to drink to such excess. Or maybe you are particularly sensitive, you may have some underlying medical issues and need to speak to a doctor. If you are overly sensitive, you should exercise caution around alcohol, which sounds like you do, so good for you!

2. Alcohol has an assignment: destruction.

Is this from scripture, the surgeon generals warning, a health and fitness blog or personal opinion…something?

3. Alcohol is a depressant. Anything that depresses should be avoided at all costs.

I have never been depressed after drinking alcohol, so maybe this is NOT true for everyone, and to act like it is is an unfair representation. Also I don’t know if ANYTHING that depresses should be avoided, sometimes I become depressed and grieved about particular issues, and it causes me to seek the Lord’s counsel with more intensity. Now if someone suffers from clinical depression, they ought to maybe exercise some caution, although in some cases, alcohol can be consumed with Joy according to Ecclesiastes 9:7, but why bring the bible into this now, after all, you did not use it in your original post.

4. I don’t want to make my brother or sister stumble in the name of exercising my “Christian liberties.” My choice to drink could lead to someone’s demise.

So we are no longer personally responsible for our own sin? That’s a relief! Now instead of “The Devil made me do it!”, I can say “You Christian liberties made me do it!”

5. Alcohol skews my judgment.

Not mine.

6. Alcohol leaves me worse, not better.

Not me.

7. What I do in moderation, my children will do in excess.

Not true, I drink way less than my parents. On the other hand, if this is true, then I can be a moderate bible reader and my kids will do it in excess, man my job just got easier!

8. Even the unsaved know I shouldn’t drink. Bible in one hand, beer in the other—any lost person could point this out as a confusing contradiction.

I’ve been able to have many conversations rich in the gospel because I was willing to go to the local pub and have a beer with my neighbor.

9. Alcohol doesn’t bring others closer to the Lord when they see me drinking, but further away.

See my response previous to this one.

10. Alcohol doesn’t bring me closer to the Lord when I drink, but further away.

See my response previous to this one.

11. I want to be fully awake and ready for the return of Christ, not drowsy, sluggish and fuzzy.

Good thing Jesus is faithful, and when he returns he will be faithful to receive all that he has saved in-spite of their mental ability at the time or whether or not that mental ability was impeded by a substance. Should a Christian on pain meds post surgery also avoid those medications that help them recover if they make them drowsy or sluggish, just in case Jesus returns?

12. Show me a family for whom alcohol has made a positive difference in their lives. You won’t be able to.

Mine! As I said before, many conversation because I was willing to share a beer, some of those with my own father. Also my favorite drinking partner is my wife, it helps us get all snuggly on the couch after the kids are in bed

13. I have never heard anyone say, “Wow, that gin and tonic made me feel so Christlike!”

* makes a gun and tonic, drinks it* “Wow, that gin and tonic made me feel so Christlike”

14. I want to avoid all appearances of evil.

Then don’t! Wait, how is alcohol evil again? Verse please!

15. Alcohol makes it much harder for me to practice the fruit of self-control.

I’m sorry to hear that, then maybe you should abstain from alcohol and ask God to search your heart for the underlying sins that cause you to loose the fruit of self-control.

16. Alcohol causes me to lose my filter.

Sorry to hear that, maybe you need to learn self-control of your tongue, and not just alcohol. If your sin is a loose filter, gossip or a sharp tongue, then alcohol doesn’t cause it, it reveals it. In that case, praise God for using alcohol to reveal your weakness, now you can zero in on it a prayerfully fight against it.

17. Alcohol is a legal mind-altering drug.

Whoa, then I must be drinking wrong, I have never had my mind altered

18. Alcohol is addictive.

Did you see the bit where I still have beer in my fridge that I bought a year ago? IF it was addictive I think I would of drank it by now.

19. Alcohol is a numbing agent for pain and sorrow only Jesus can heal.

Right, using alcohol to fill a need only Jesus can is a serious problem. This would be treating alcohol like your savior, but alcohol does NOT cause this sin, it reveals it. Also, I have never used alcohol to numb anything.

20. Many regrets are associated with alcohol. (I can give you a whole bunch!)

No regrets are associated with alcohol, (I can give you none). Your experience vs my experiences

21. No one has ever said, “If only I had taken a drink, things wouldn’t have gotten out of control.”

Right, cause that is a ridiculous statement.

22. Alcohol causes me to act in ways I normally wouldn’t.

You would normally act that way given the right set of circumstances, so yes, you should avoid those circumstance, but you should also understand that your weakness is not caused by those circumstances. Your problem is still very real even without those circumstances.

23. Alcohol kills brain cells.

Not if you are drinking biblically (in moderation)

24. Alcohol is a counterfeit and provides a false peace.

Right, but alcohol is not the problem, its that we are worshiping alcohol like a god. Alcohol is no more to blame than the Golden Calf in the wilderness.

25. The Bible says that no drunkards will enter the kingdom of God. Being drunk starts with one drink. I don’t want to see how far outside the lines I can color when eternity is at stake.

-_- I’ll just continue to believe that God will be faithful to save me, I’ll place my confidence in his ability to keep his covenant. *sips more of that gin and tonic*

26. Alcohol is a waster—money, gifts and talents, destinies and so on.

Then pretty much anything can be a “waster”, again, its not a problem with the “thing”, but with the heart of the person using that thing.

27. Alcohol leads to really bad behavior. It is a factor in 50 percent of violent crimes.

Let go back to my bullet analogy. Their chambers are filled with violent bullets, alcohol is the trigger. They still have issues with violence with or without alcohol. Your point also works both ways. Alcohol is NOT a factor in 50 percent of violent crimes. Do you know what is a factor 100 percent of the time? Sinful people who need redemption.

28. Alcohol distracts and derails you from living the victorious life for which Christ died.

Alcohol helps me celebrate my victorious life! *sip*

29. Wisdom is the principle thing that I need to pursue at all cost; alcohol makes me stupid.

Yeah, you should definitely see a doctor and continue to abstain. I don’t know you, so I can’t attest to this fact, but in your article, your poor understanding of scripture makes you seem foolish. Also Christ is the principle thing we should pursue at all cost.

30. Alcohol has ruined many, many marriages.

Those marriages may still be together if we only got past the external abuses of alcohol and really got to the heart issues underneath those failing marriages. In a way, alcohol is only the tip of the iceberg, the bulk of the problem is underneath. Also, did I mention that my wife and I get all snuggly after a few drinks? Being Snuggly is good for marriages. *makes wife a gin and tonic*

31. The only influence I should be “under” is God’s.

Which is why I don’t let alcohol influence me or drink to such excess that it does.

32. The Bible tells me to be alert; alcohol delays my reaction time.

Okay, sometimes playing around all day with my kids makes me tired which delays my reaction time, should I stop playing with my kids?

33. If I don’t start drinking, I’ll never have to stop.

Wow, we must live in entirely different context.

34. Alcohol severely tarnishes my testimony.

Wow, we must live in entirely different context.

35. Don’t want your teenagers to drink? Yep, same reasons apply to you.

Nope, same reasons don’t apply, the only reason I don’t want my teenager to drink is that it is illegal for them. If I see certain characteristics in my children that give other reasons for them specifically to abstain, then I will address them with my child biblically.

36. God is holy; alcohol is not.

I’ll take “Things not ever said in scripture” for 1000 Alex.

37. Alcohol and prayer don’t mix.

Hey, lets stay on topic, Praying and drinking is different than if we should abstain all together.

38. Alcohol and Bible study don’t mix.

Hey, lets stay on topic, bible study and drinking is different than if we should abstain all together.

39. Alcohol lowers my resolve to resist temptation.

If abstaining helps you resits, then great, and maybe others should too, but for me alcohol is not a factor, and it is not normative for everyone.

40. Alcohol = Brokenness (broken lives, health, dreams and so on)

Scripture citation please.

41. When the world sees us drinking, it sends the message that Jesus isn’t enough.

The “World”? Apparently you do not understand the cultural or missional implications of your opinion.

42. Moderate drinking? How about moderate pornography or moderate heroin use or moderate lying or moderate adultery?

How about moderate bible reading? I kid, but seriously your examples are setting up a straw-man argument. Specifically with adultery, adultery is the result of sex used sinfully. As we already covered before, sex is NOT a sin, sex with someone that is not your spouse is.  There is no such thing as moderate sin, drinking is not a sin, excessive drinking, also known as drunkenness, is a sin. So your example should say “Moderate Drunkenness?” There is no such thing because if you’ve already moved to drunkenness then you are already sinning, same thing with pornography and adultery. Is it a sin to be moderately aroused by your spouse? No, but this is they type of fallacious argument you are using. 

43. Christians are called to live a life of total surrender and separation from the world.

Yes, even in the way they partake of alcohol.

44. Alcohol makes me forget. It can make me forget that I am married, that I am saved and so on.

What the what? You have much bigger issues than alcohol.

45. “I don’t get drunk. I only have one or two drinks.” If they didn’t affect you, you would drink soda.

I am not sure what you are trying to say, soda in excess can have adverse affects too.

46. I should never look to the glass or bottle for joy, which can only be found in the Lord Jesus Christ.

Yes, but I don’t not find my Joy in drink, I express my Joy in Christ with a drink.  “In Christ God has atoned for all my sins! Cheers and Amen”

47. Alcohol fills my mind with impure thoughts.

No, alcohol reveals them.

48. If it could hinder my faith walk or love walk or dishonor the lordship of Jesus Christ, I need to forsake it.

Everything potentially has that problem, so should we forsake everything that God has given us? Surely not if we are using it properly.

49. Alcohol doesn’t help me run the race that Jesus has marked before me to finish with more accuracy. It does the polar opposite.

Do you got a verse for me yet?

50. For any argument that tries to justify Christian drinking, there are at least 50 other reasons not to. The writing is on the wall. It’s not God’s best for Christians to drink.

I don’t care what wall the writing is on, or how many counter arguments there are, if it is not in the bible and we are not talking about what a Christian should or should not do, we are merely talking about personal experience and preferences.

The Cost of a Conscience is the Cost of a Baby.

Standard

I wasn’t sure if I should show my hand at the top of this blog. At first, I’d though I’d bury the lead and be clever about where I’m going with this particular blog post. I’d give you my  thoughts, that would hopefully sway you towards my point of view, then at the end, BOOM! Drop the mic and leave all two of my readers in a better place that would last the rest of their lives. Ultimately I decided against this. With the recent public discourse around abortion, and specifically around the fury surrounding the Center for Medical Progress’s expose of Planned Parenthood’s illegal profiting, I though it’d be best to put the thesis of my feelings in the title.

Now this is a theology blog, and some may say that this isn’t the place for theology, and they would be wrong. Everything is formed by the highest imaginable thought. The highest imaginable thought, is God, or some might saying meaning or purpose, but really it’s that attempt to get to the central idea of everything, God. As a result, every thought that flows from that original highest thought is theological. The fact that everything you believe can first be divided into two by starting with “Do you believe in God?”, means that every thought or action proceeding that first question, is theological in its conception.

With abortion, we simply follow the logic. IF there is a God, and IF he has revealed himself to be the Christian God, and then IF the bible is true, then it would seem to assert that all humans, and potential humans (fertilized eggs), are image bearers of that God, or at least potential image bearers. As such, they inherently have the right to life that the ONLY the maker of the image has the moral authority to bestow or take away. Now some would obviously argue the morality of this God, but that is for another blog, so I’ll ask you to please stay in the vein of this particular discussion.

Following this internal logic of the orthodox christian worldview, this would mean that any attempt to stop an image bearer from reaching their potential as an image bearer, that is NOT ordained by the maker of that image, is treason against that maker, also commonly called SIN. (In simple terms, God makes and gives life, and is the only one allowed to give it or take it away.)

There has been plenty of “He said, she said” through this public discussion.

“Oh, no we do not profit from illegal selling of dead baby body parts.”

“Well, what about this video?”

“That video is heavily edited!”

“Well here then, what about the full unedited video that in full context says the same thing?”

“Ummmm…”

Now I don’t blog too much, to which some of you may say “Yeah, we can tell.” I wish I could blog more, but time in my life is of short supply, so I only blog when something seems to be missing from the conversation. After both sides have picked their talking points (some more valid than others), and I’m left somewhere between the two with my hand raised saying, “Well what about this?”

For me, I try to get into people’s heads. In this particular case I might ask “How does a doctor or medical professional justify such acts?” To this I think the answer is simple, we just follow the logic of the pro-choice view.

The logic is as follows.

IF a baby is not a baby, but just a fetus, and that fetus is just a random bit of cellular material cobbled together and called tissue, then there should be no moral question when it comes to selling off, or destroying this tissue. IF it is just tissue, than it (the baby) is no different than a tumor being removed from a host. Or if you were to scrape your knee, and a great gash is caused, and a chunk of skin is peeled loose, dead baby tissue is no different than that chunk. Therefore, we should not make a fuss or mourn over it’s loss. After all, no one cries over loosing a tumor. This IS the train of logic of the pro-choice position. What happens internally to a person as they convince themselves of this logic is another thing.

To kill a baby we must first convince our gut that we are not killing a baby, so we must first recast what a baby is. So in the minds of some, a baby is no different than cancer, it’s merely tissue. Let that sink in. My five daughters, and one baby boy, for those who would say that this is okay, at one point in their development, believe that my children had no more value than cancer. So for my pro-choice friends, next time you see a child, or perhaps your own child, look them in the eye and tell them that at one point, before they were born, when they were very very small, that you thought of them in the same way that you do a tumor. Then ask yourself, what has changed that makes you no longer consider them a tumor?

The question then must be asked, “assuming that all babies are just tissue, and all tissue is equal, then why is baby tissue sometimes kept, then raised, and loved over other tissue? Should we also keep, love and raise tumor tissue? If not, then what is the difference?” Is there some intrinsic worth or value that baby tissue has over other tissue that may make it worthy of love? If so, then we must rethink our position and admit that baby tissue is dramatically different from other tissue. For now however, for the sake of argument, lets continue with this logic train in light of this most current fiasco.

If I were an oncologist (cancer doctor in layman’s terms), and I were to remove a tumor (tissue) from a patient, then after that surgery, a research group were to approach me and say, “Hey, can we have that tumor, when can study it and learn from it, and heck, we will even give you $50 bucks for it, and if you have any more, we will pay you for those too!” This is the logic behind these videos, this is how one can sale baby parts like it’s no big deal. A baby, is no different than a tumor, so why does it matter if I sell it? I would agree, it doesn’t matter at all, IF that were truly the case. (In this blog you should always pay close attention to the “If”s )

What is curious though, is the overwhelming moral outrage, yes from those conservatives, but also from those liberals, who, up until the talking points where finally hashed out, were remarkably quite. Now some did speak up, but only against the calloused and casual nature of which the planned parenthood leaders spoke, not to the horrors that they were speaking of, just that they should of been more considerate in the way the spoke of it. Unfortunately they did not think back through all the faulty logic that led to the “pro-babies are just tumors” position. Perhaps from political pressures, surly they don’t want to upset their financial backers, or maybe even deeper, they don’t want to admit that they are wrong. IF they were to completely retract their position, it would also be an admission that the “tumor babies” are human beings, and that up and to this point, they have advocated, and supported funding for, the murder of those humans. This is a hard pill for anyone to swallow.

As usual, the bible shows us that this is exactly how the minds of people, plagued by sin, would react. We blame-shift, minimize our part in the activity, maximize our other virtues, and simply skirt around the main issue, “This is an attack on women’s health!” Even though no one is suggesting that they end any of those other services, and ignoring the fact that it does not matter if a murderer gives millions to charity, he is still a murderer. We don’t call our sin “sin”, we recast it as a moral failure, a mistake, or a lapse in judgement. This is very similar to the way we recast a baby as nothing more than a tumor, and as we do, we sear our consciences up, and become more calloused, maybe to the point to where we can casually sip wine and eat food as we discuss how we crush a baby in such a specific way to keep most of him in tact.

The most recent, “as the bible would predict” moment, has been for Planned Parenthood to point to the other services, as mentioned before, that Planned Parenthood offers saying, “Look at all the good we do”, claiming that “abortions only make up a mere 3% of our services!” Now this is a good rabbit hole to go down, but I wont, because Kevin DeYoung already has pointed out how we should be suspect when an organization provides its own numbers for us to believe, and even shows how these numbers are myths. Furthermore, these other services, as Dr. Ben Carson pointed out, should be readily available through other legislation passed by our current commander and chief.

All that being said, at it’s best, Planned Parenthood, is funded by your tax dollars, even if you object of their activities, and is most likely is profiting from further illegal activities. Under current legislation, it’s other services are moot because they can be found anywhere, and is possibly fundamentally racist in its targeting of key low-income demographics. This doesn’t even bring into full account the morality of the central issue of abortion, but all things being equal, lets assume that abortion is no different that adoption.

These two options seem to be the primary options when it comes to babies who’s parents, for whatever reason, are unable to provide for them or simply don’t want them. So for the sake of thought, lets give them complete equality in merit and value and morality. Now lets say there is potential for you to profit from abortion through selling baby tissue, and in this scenario, there is no moral question or law in place to prohibit that sale. Which do you, as a counselor/provider, hope your client picks? Which one do you, potentially try to sway them towards? The profitable abortion, or the unprofitable adoption? Now I am not asking for what should happen, I’m asking you to be honest with yourself and ask, “What would you do in that situation?” Personally I’ve long fought a romanticized opinion of myself, and if all things are equal, in that position, I would be swayed to sway my client towards the end that would profit me more.

Now lets factor back in the morality so now your conscience also works against you as well. Now we just have to find the price it would take for you to shut your conscience up. Like in the videos, is it $50 per dead baby tissue, $75, maybe a $100? See how easily that small voice in your head and heart gets even smaller when the dollar signs start going up?

Let’s do some math.

Planned Parenthood boast that only 3% of its total services are actually abortions (you can read the Kevin DeYoung article mentioned above to see why those numbers shouldn’t be trusted), and for the sake of argument, lets accept them as fact. Planned Parenthood boast 11 million total services, of which more than 300,000 (327,653 to be exact) were abortions, roughly only 3%

So maybe you said, “Nope, I would never sell my conscience for the price of a baby, not $50, not $75, not even for a $100!” How about we take that low end price, $50, and multiply it by the number of abortions by planned parenthood in the last year?

$50 x 327,653 dead baby tissues = $16,382,650 potential income.

What about that number, is that enough for your conscience, 16 million a year?

The justification easily flows… “Well maybe I’m actually sparing that child from a hard life… maybe they’ll just become part of the system… there’s no guarantee that they will find a good family for them… they’ll just become a drain on society… in a way, I’m doing them and everyone a favor.”

With those numbers it becomes extremely easy to start justifying murder.

“These people shouldn’t even be having kids if they can’t take care of them!” Let’s follow that logic as well. In addition to telling all the children in the world that they are no different than a tumor, to be logically consistent in this view, you would also have to look at my two adopted daughters and tell them that it would of been better if their mom would of aborted them. No more Stella and no more Skylee, according to this worldview’s logic, they should not of been allowed to become human beings.

Don’t think to much about it, you’ll make yourself sad. Instead of dealing with the logical outcome of these lies, you can just believe them, and cover the hole in your conscience with some extra money.

Back to adoption and abortion, if there is no moral difference between the two, and there is no financial incentive towards one or the other, you would expect the number of adoption referrals to abortion, to be similar. Not necessarily equal, but close if both option are given fair treatment, but the numbers don’t reflect this either.

In that same year Planned Parenthood listed only 31,098 “prenatal services” and a meager 841 “adoption referrals to other agencies.” Which means that if you walk into Planned Parenthood with an unborn baby you are 10 times more likely to get an abortion than prenatal screening and almost 400 times more likely to be offered an abortion than given an adoption referral.

Surely, if all of these options have equal value and weight, then the numbers would reflect it. So what is tipping the scale? It must be that extra $16 mil. Now what if there was more incentive for Planed Parenthood agencies for adoption referrals, would the numbers even out?

Now, if you ever have read my blog before you’ll know I never scorn my opposition without also scorning my own team, so here is another set of numbers for you.

There are and estimated 40-50 million adoptable orphans in the world who are at risk of disease and death, and I know that is a lot, but they are ready, simply waiting for willing parents to cut through the red tape and save their lives. To this number, there is reportedly over 2 billion of the world’s total population that identify as Christian. Now identifying is one thing, but of that over 2 billion, 800 million claim that they have a definite relationship with Jesus Christ, meaning that their faith is not just part of their culture, but that it is important and real to them and their lives.

These Christians, who according to their bibles, were once useless, abandoned, helpless, unwanted and destitute as the orphans of the world, but they were adopted by God through his Son Christ and he has called them wanted. Think of that, the God of the universe wants you! Not because you are special, but because He is good!

So take the low number of Christians (800 Million), and tell them that true religion is taking care of widows in orphans (as it does in James 1:27), and tell them to tackle this problem and it would only take a mere 6 to 7% of the body of Christ to adopt a child, and there would no longer be any children available for adoption in need of a family. Christians could, and should, end orphans.

So my big question is this. Would the demand for abortion on demand, be in such demand, if more Christians were to say to those unwanted children that they are wanted, and through adoption, love them in the exact same way that they have been loved through Christ? How would that change the way that the world sees Christ and his church? How would the love of Jesus, through his followers, literally change the world?

Abortion is the sinful outcome of a lack of christian unwillingness to adopt.

It may not of caused it, but it sure as hell left the door wide open for it.